Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38189462›Full record

ArticleResearch in psychotherapy (Milano)2023

The catcher in the mind: validation of the brief-mentalized affectivity scale for adolescents in the Italian population.

Marianna Liotti, Alice Fiorini Bincoletto, Fabiola Bizzi, Marta Tironi, Simone Charpentier Mora, Donatella Cavanna, Guido Giovanardi, Elliot Jurist, Anna Maria Speranza, Vittorio Lingiardi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in psychotherapy (Milano), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marianna LiottiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome. marianna.liotti@uniroma1.it.
Alice Fiorini BincolettoDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome. alice.fiorinibincoletto@uniroma1.it.
Fabiola BizziDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Genoa. fabiola.bizzi@unige.it.
Marta TironiDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Genoa. marta.tironi@edu.unige.it.
Simone Charpentier MoraDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Genoa. simone.charpentiermora@edu.unige.it.
Donatella CavannaDepartment of Educational Sciences, University of Genoa. donatella.cavanna@unige.it.
Guido GiovanardiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome. guido.giovanardi@uniroma1.it.
Elliot JuristDepartment of Psychology, City College of the City University of New York. ejurist5@gmail.com.
Anna Maria SperanzaDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome. annamaria.speranza@uniroma1.it.
Vittorio LingiardiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome. vittorio.lingiardi@uniroma1.it.
Annalisa TanzilliDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome. annalisa.tanzilli@uniroma1.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of mentalized affectivity (MA) encompasses the dimensions of identifying, processing, and expressing emotions and describes the process of making sense of and reevaluating one's affects in light of autobiographical memory. This construct was developed within the theoretical framework of mentalization and, due to its interpersonal nature, added further complexity to the emotion regulation construct. This research aimed to examine the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Brief-Mentalized Affectivity Scale for adolescents (B-MAS-A) on an Italian sample of young people (aged 13-19 years). Data were collected using non-probabilistic sampling and an online survey. Participants were asked to complete a large battery of instruments, including the B-MAS-A, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire, the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, and the General Self-Efficacy Scale. In study 1, factor analyses carried out on a total sample of 566 adolescents identified 3 distinct dimensions of the same components of MA found in the adult population: i) identifying; ii) processing; iii) expressing emotions. The subscales showed excellent internal consistency. Study 2 (involving a subsample of 288 participants) demonstrated good levels of construct and criterion validity. These results confirm that the B-MAS-A represents a valid and robust instrument for assessing the complex and multifaceted characteristics of MA in adolescents. The B-MAS-A can make a significant contribution to clinical practice and research and encourage systematic studies on MA in psychotherapy, taking into account the developmental stage of adolescence.

Identifiers

PMID38189462
PMCPMC10849075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.