Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38189400›Full record

Trial reportNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University2023

[Comparison of clinical effects and safety of remidazolam and esketamine for preoperative sedation in children].

M Wu, F Yang, X Ma, N Cai

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. EDFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Trial
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M WuDepartment of Anesthesia, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang 236000, China.
F YangDepartment of Anesthesia, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang 236000, China.
X MaDepartment of Anesthesia, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang 236000, China.
N CaiDepartment of Anesthesia, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang 236000, China.
Fuyang City People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the clinical effects and safety of remiazolam and esketamine in preoperative sedation in children.

methodsThis study was conducted among 61 children (1-4 years old) undergoing elective bilateral tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy under general anesthesia from January 2022 to March 2023. The children were randomized into two groups to receive preoperative sedation with intravenous administration of 0.2 mg/kg remidazolam (R group, 30 cases) or 0.5 mg/kg esketamine (S group, 31 cases). The two groups were compared for PSAS score, vital signs (MAP, SpO

resultsThe PSAS score, sedation score, mask acceptance score at induction, MAP and HR after induction, Ramsay sedation score after awakening, propofol dose during anesthesia induction, and the incidence of EA and NPOBCs after operation were all similar between the two groups (

conclusionIn children aged 1-4 years, compared with 0.5 mg/kg esketamine, intravenous injection of 0.2 mg/kg remidazolam for preoperative sedation has a slightly longer onset time and is associated with a shorter recovery time and more stable hemodynamics, suggesting its good feasibility and safety.

Indexed as

Emergence DeliriumKetaminePropofolAnesthesia, GeneralChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantRemifentanilEsketamineKetaminePropofolRemifentanilchildrenesketaminepreoperative sedationremidazolam

Identifiers

PMID38189400
PMCPMC10774111
OpenAlexW4390743955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.