Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38189360›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2024

Safety and immunogenicity of conjugate vaccine for typhoid (Vi-DT): Finding from an observer-blind, active-controlled, randomized, non-inferiority, phase III clinical trial among healthy volunteers.

Dipesh Tamrakar, Pranodan Poudel, Pragya Thapa, Srijana Singh, Amit Khadgi, Sameera Thapa, Rajendra Tamrakar, Anmol Shrestha, Surendra Madhup, Ganesh Kumar Rai and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Typhoid conjugate vaccines for preventing typhoid fever (enteric fever).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dipesh TamrakarDhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-0772-3653
Pranodan PoudelDhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Pragya ThapaDhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Srijana SinghDhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Amit KhadgiDhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Sameera ThapaDhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Rajendra TamrakarDhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Anmol ShresthaDhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Surendra MadhupDhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Ganesh Kumar RaiKanti Children Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Birendra Prasad GuptaInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tarun SalujaInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sushant SahastrabuddheInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Rajeev ShresthaDhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, Dhulikhel, Nepal.
Dhulikhel Hospital · NPInternational Vaccine Institute · KRKanti Children's Hospital · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Typhoid fever is a significant public health concern with most of the sufferers between 15 and 25 y of age in Nepal. We undertook this study to demonstrate Vi polysaccharide conjugated with diphtheria toxoid (Vi-DT) conjugate vaccine which is non-inferior to Typbar typhoid conjugate vaccine, a Vi polysaccharide vaccine conjugated with tetanus toxoid (Vi-TT) with a focus on the adult population from Dhulikhel Hospital which was one of the total four sites in Nepal. In this study, we assigned the eligible participants in 1:1:1:1 ratio by block randomization, and stratified into three age groups (6 months to less than 2 y, 2 y to less than 18 y, and 18 y to 45 y), allotted to Group A, B, C, and D. Group A, B, and C received 25 μg (0.5 mL) of Vi-DT study vaccine and participants in Group D received 25 μg (0.5 mL) Vi-TT vaccine. We descriptively analyzed safety in all the participants receiving one dose of the investigational vaccine. The anti-Vi-IgG seroconversion rate in Vi-DT recipients was 99.71% (97.5% CI 98.04-99.96; 344 of 345 participants) and 99.13% (94.27-99.87; 114 of 115) in Vi-TT recipients which indicates that Vi-DT vaccine is non-inferior to Vi-TT vaccine. In safety aspect, 16.81% of total subject had at least one solicited adverse reaction and 22.61% of the Vi-TT participants experienced at least one solicited adverse reaction with most of them being local adverse reactions. None of the enrolled participants reported serious adverse events. Our study shows that a single dose of the Vi-DT vaccine is immunogenic, safe to administer and non-inferior to the Vi-TT vaccine four weeks after vaccination.

Indexed as

Typhoid FeverTyphoid-Paratyphoid VaccinesAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDiphtheria-Tetanus VaccineHealthy VolunteersHumansInfantMiddle AgedPolysaccharidesVaccines, ConjugateYoung AdultDiphtheria-Tetanus VaccinePolysaccharidesTyphoid-Paratyphoid VaccinesVaccines, Conjugateconjugate vaccineobserver-blindphase III clinical trialrandomizedTyphoid

Identifiers

PMID38189360
PMCPMC10793708
OpenAlexW4390670464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.