Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38189256›Full record

ArticlemSystems2024

GSR-DB: a manually curated and optimized taxonomical database for 16S rRNA amplicon analysis.

Leidy-Alejandra G Molano, Sara Vega-Abellaneda, Chaysavanh Manichanh

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07505212 (Exploring Tannin-Probiotic Interactions on Microbial Composition and Inflammatory Outcomes in Obesity), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07505212 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Exploring Tannin-Probiotic Interactions on Microbial Composition and Inflammatory Outcomes in Obesity

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrairie View A&M UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsObesity (Disorder)ArmsGallotannin-rich mango, Lactiplantibacillus pentosus (probiotic), No Treatment Added
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leidy-Alejandra G Molano *Microbiome Lab, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Passeig Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0069-6098
Sara Vega-Abellaneda *Microbiome Lab, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Passeig Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0009-0007-0051-8554
Chaysavanh ManichanhMicrobiome Lab, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Passeig Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2287-4003

Funding

MEC | Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) PI20/00130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amplicon-based 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing remains a widely used method to profile microbial communities, especially in low biomass samples, due to its cost-effectiveness and low-complexity approach. Reference databases are a mainstay for taxonomic assignments, which typically rely on popular databases such as SILVA, Greengenes, Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB), or Ribosomal Database Project (RDP). However, the inconsistency of the nomenclature across databases and the presence of shortcomings in the annotation of these databases are limiting the resolution of the analysis. To overcome these limitations, we created the GSR database (Greengenes, SILVA, and RDP database), an integrated and manually curated database for bacterial and archaeal 16S amplicon taxonomy analysis. Unlike previous integration approaches, this database creation pipeline includes a taxonomy unification step to ensure consistency in taxonomical annotations. The database was validated with three mock communities, two real data sets, and a 10-fold cross-validation method and compared with existing 16S databases such as Greengenes, Greengenes 2, GTDB, ITGDB, SILVA, RDP, and MetaSquare. Results showed that the GSR database enhances taxonomical annotations of 16S sequences, outperforming current 16S databases at the species level, based on the evaluation of the mock communities. This was confirmed by the 10-fold cross-validation, except for Greengenes 2. The GSR database is available for full-length 16S sequences and the most commonly used hypervariable regions: V4, V1-V3, V3-V4, and V3-V5.IMPORTANCETaxonomic assignments of microorganisms have long been hindered by inconsistent nomenclature and annotation issues in existing databases like SILVA, Greengenes, Greengenes2, Genome Taxonomy Database, or Ribosomal Database Project. To overcome these issues, we created Greengenes-SILVA-RDP database (GSR-DB), accurate and comprehensive taxonomic annotations of 16S amplicon data. Unlike previous approaches, our innovative pipeline includes a unique taxonomy unification step, ensuring consistent and reliable annotations. Our evaluation analyses showed that GSR-DB outperforms existing databases in providing species-level resolution, especially based on mock-community analysis, making it a game-changer for microbiome studies. Moreover, GSR-DB is designed to be accessible to researchers with limited computational resources, making it a powerful tool for scientists across the board. Available for full-length 16S sequences and commonly used hypervariable regions, including V4, V1-V3, V3-V4, and V3-V5, GSR-DB is a go-to database for robust and accurate microbial taxonomy analysis.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrobiotaArchaeaDatabases, FactualRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAdatabasemicrobiometaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID38189256
PMCPMC10946287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.