ArticleJournal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery
Penis Girth Augmentation Using SEPA Flap and Dermofat Grafts.
Article in Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Techniques for Penile Augmentation Surgery: A Systematic Review of Surgical Outcomes, Complications, and Quality of Life.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- The outcomes of non-surgical and surgical penile augmentation procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Men of various ages feel that an increase in penile size would give them and their sexual partners an increased confidence. There are a variety of methods for increasing penile girth, such as injection therapies and surgery. All of these methods have a high complication rate which must be emphasized to the patients. In this article, the techniques used for increasing penile girth using dermofat grafts and SEPA (superior external pudendal artery) flaps are highlighted along with their complications and their management thereof. Patients and Methods: Ten patients were operated for penile girth augmentation between June 2016 and March 2022. Of these, six patients had augmentation using dermofat grafts and four patients had SEPA flaps. Patients were chosen as per the Augmentation Phalloplasty Patient Selection and Satisfaction Inventory (APPSSI) score which was between 2 and 6 in the pre-operative period. The age range of the patients were between 25 and 57 years. The mid-penile girth in the flaccid state ranged from 8.8 to 12.3 cm. Results: Post-operatively, after 6 months, the final girth increase varied from 1.9 to 2.6 cm. The complication rate was 50% and included skin loss, urinary obstruction, fat necrosis, and so on. The post-operative APPSSI score ranged from 2 to 12. Complications were more in uncircumcised patients and in those who desired excessive augmentation. Conclusion: Penis girth augmentation using SEPA flaps and dermofat grafts is indicated in patients who fulfill the criteria and give appreciable girth increase, but patients need to be aware of the potential complications of these surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.