Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38189057›Full record

ArticleTheScientificWorldJournal2023

Improving the Forecasting Accuracy Based on the Lunar Calendar in Modeling Rainfall Levels Using the Bi-LSTM Method through the Grid Search Approach.

Gumgum Darmawan, Budhi Handoko, Defi Yusti Faidah, Dian Islamiaty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gumgum DarmawanDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl.Bandung-Sumedang Km 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6363-548X
Budhi HandokoDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl.Bandung-Sumedang Km 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2008-7786
Defi Yusti FaidahDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl.Bandung-Sumedang Km 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7474-2336
Dian IslamiatyDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl.Bandung-Sumedang Km 21 Jatinangor, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rainfall is one of the climatic factors that influence various human activities and affect decision making in daily life activities. High intensity of rainfall can turn into a threat and cause serious problems such as causing various natural disasters. Therefore, it is essential to conduct rainfall forecasting to anticipate and enable preventive actions and can be used as a decision consideration in increasing the productivity and mobility of human activities. The aim of this study is to compare rainfall accuracy between the Gregorian and the lunar calendars using the bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) machine learning model through the grid search approach. This method was used because it can capture patterns arising from the simultaneous effects of two asynchronous calendars, Gregorian and lunar, which were used in this study by finding the right parameters. Monthly rainfall data from Bogor City, Indonesia, were used from the period of 2001 to 2022. The results show that the MAPE of the lunar calendar is relatively smaller at 14.82% which indicates the better forecasting ability than the Gregorian calendar which is 35.12%.

Identifiers

PMID38189057
PMCPMC10771920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.