ArticleBiophysical reports2024
Observing mechanosensitive channels in action in living bacteria.
Article in Biophysical reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Navigating the copper highway: bacterial strategies for cytoplasmic import.Journal of inorganic biochemistry · 2026Review
- Second harmonic scattering investigation of bacterial efflux induced by the antibiotic tetracycline.The Journal of chemical physics · 2024Article
- Miltefosine impacts small molecule transport in Gram-positive bacteria.RSC chemical biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanosensitive (MS) channels act to protect the cytoplasmic membrane (CM) of living cells from environmental changes in osmolarity. In this report, we demonstrate the use of time-resolved second-harmonic light scattering (SHS) as a means of experimentally observing the relative state (open versus closed) of MS channels in living bacteria suspended in different buffer solutions. Specifically, the state of the MS channels was selectively controlled by changing the composition of the suspension medium, inducing either a transient or persistent osmotic shock. SHS was then used to monitor transport of the SHG-active cation, malachite green, across the bacterial CM. When MS channels were forced open, malachite green cations were able to cross the CM at a rate at least two orders of magnitude faster compared with when the MS channels were closed. These observations were corroborated using both numerical model simulations and complementary fluorescence experiments, in which the propensity for the CM impermeant cation, propidium, to stain cells was shown to be contingent upon the relative state of the MS channels (i.e., cells with open MS channels fluoresced red, cells with closed MS channels did not). Application of time-resolved SHS to experimentally distinguish MS channels opened via osmotic shock versus chemical activation, as well as a general comparison with the patch-clamp method is discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.