Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38188935›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024

Deep learning segmentation of endothelial cell images using an active learning paradigm with guided label corrections.

Naomi Joseph, Ian Marshall, Elizabeth Fitzpatrick, Harry J Menegay, Jonathan H Lass, Beth Ann M Benetz, David L Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Naomi JosephCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Ian MarshallCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Elizabeth FitzpatrickCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Harry J MenegayCase Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Jonathan H LassCase Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Beth Ann M BenetzCase Western Reserve University and University Hospitals Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
David L WilsonCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9763-1463

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE AND HYBRIDOMA MODULEP30EY011373 · NEI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Irina A Pikuleva · 1997 to 2026
$17.7M
Interdisciplinary Biomedical Imaging Training ProgramT32EB007509 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVID Lynn WILSON, Xin Yu · 2007 to 2026
$5.6M
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITIESC06RR012463 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTINA, KENNETH L · 1997 to 1997
–
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR012463NEI NIH HHS P30 EY011373NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB007509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To create Guided Correction Software for informed manual editing of automatically generated corneal endothelial cell (EC) segmentations and apply it to an active learning paradigm to analyze a diverse set of post-keratoplasty EC images. Approach: An original U-Net model trained on 130 manually labeled post-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (EK) images was applied to 841 post-Descemet membrane EK images generating "uncorrected" cell border segmentations. Segmentations were then manually edited using the Guided Correction Software to create corrected labels. This dataset was split into 741 training and 100 testing EC images. U-Net and DeepLabV3+ were trained on the EC images and the corresponding uncorrected and corrected labels. Model performance was evaluated in a cell-by-cell analysis. Evaluation metrics included the number of over-segmentations, under-segmentations, correctly identified new cells, and endothelial cell density (ECD). Results: Utilizing corrected segmentations for training U-Net and DeepLabV3+ improved their performance. The average number of over- and under-segmentations per image was reduced from 23 to 11 with the corrected training set. Predicted ECD values generated by networks trained on the corrected labels were not significantly different than the ground truth counterparts ( Conclusions: Guided Correction Software can efficiently label new training data for improved deep learning performance and generalization between EC datasets.

Indexed as

corneadeep learningendothelial cell segmentation

Identifiers

PMID38188935
PMCPMC10767756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.