Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38188927›Full record

ReviewEndoscopy international open2024

Intraductal radiofrequency ablation plus biliary stent versus stent alone for malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Matheus de Oliveira Veras, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Thomas R McCarty, Guilherme Henrique Peixoto de Oliveira, Rômulo Sérgio Araújo Gomes, Davi Lucena Landim, Felipe Giacobo Nunes, Tomazo Antônio Prince Franzini, Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos Santos, Wanderley Marques Bernardo and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopy international open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Reply to Chandrasekhara and Aggarwal.Endoscopy international open · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matheus de Oliveira VerasGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9881-9855
Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Thomas R McCartyInternal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4517-5261
Guilherme Henrique Peixoto de OliveiraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1057-2390
Rômulo Sérgio Araújo GomesGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Davi Lucena LandimGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Felipe Giacobo NunesGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Tomazo Antônio Prince FranziniGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos SantosGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9759-3807
Wanderley Marques BernardoGastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

PTCD/PTCSStrictures

Identifiers

PMID38188927
PMCPMC10769587
OpenAlexW4388441367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.