Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38188853›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2024

Delayed intestinal perforation associated with peritoneal dialysis: A case report of maintaining dialysis after perforation.

Ru Zhou, Minhong Luo, Hairong Tang, Tiecheng Yang, Hualin Ma, Zhen Wang, Xinzhou Zhang, Baochun Guo

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ru ZhouDepartment of Nephrology, Shenzhen Peoples Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology Shenzhen China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8599-5697
Minhong LuoDepartment of Nephrology The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Shenzhen China.
Hairong TangDepartment of Nephrology The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Shenzhen China.
Tiecheng YangDepartment of Nephrology The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Shenzhen China.
Hualin MaDepartment of Nephrology, Shenzhen Peoples Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology Shenzhen China.
Zhen WangDepartment of Nephrology, Shenzhen Peoples Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology Shenzhen China.
Xinzhou ZhangDepartment of Nephrology, Shenzhen Peoples Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology Shenzhen China.
Baochun GuoDepartment of Nephrology, Shenzhen Peoples Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology Shenzhen China.
Jinan University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delayed intestinal perforation has various manifestations. For peritonitis with delayed treatment and multi-bacterial peritonitis, we should be alert to the occurrence of this rare complication. Abdominal CT examination and imaging results judgment based on clinical conditions are particularly important for diagnosis. Delayed intestinal perforation of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a rare but serious complication. We reported a 49-year-old patient who had been hospitalized twice within 3 months due to poor drainage of the peritoneal dialysis catheter. During the first hospitalization, peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis was diagnosed, and a variety of bacterial infections were cultivated. However, at that time, the actual peritoneal dialysis catheter-related intestinal perforation was missed, and he was discharged after anti-infection treatment until a clinical cure was met. After more than 2 months of normal peritoneal dialysis after returning home, the patient again had poor drainage of the peritoneal dialysis catheter, accompanied by the outflow of yellowish-brown sediment. It was found that the peritoneal dialysis catheter had evidence of intestinal perforation. After the removal of the catheter and intestinal repair, he recovered and was discharged from the hospital and received long-term hemodialysis treatment. In the case of delayed intestinal perforation, peritoneal dialysis was maintained normally for more than 2 months, which was an unprecedented situation in previous case reports. In addition, we should be alert to the occurrence of this rare complication, especially when we find the occurrence of polybacterial Peritonitis. Abdominal CT examination and imaging results judgment based on clinical conditions are particularly important for diagnosis.

Indexed as

bowel perforationPD catheterPolybacterial peritonitis

Identifiers

PMID38188853
PMCPMC10769894
OpenAlexW4390629936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.