Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38188654›Full record

ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2024

Multicenter comparison of analytical interferences of 25-OH vitamin D immunoassay and mass spectrometry methods by endogenous interferents and cross-reactivity with 3-epi-25-OH-vitamin D

Joon Hee Lee, Jong Do Seo, Kyunghoon Lee, Eun Youn Roh, Yeo-Min Yun, Yong-Wha Lee, Sung-Eun Cho, Junghan Song

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessment of Serum 3-Epi-25-Hydroxyvitamin DJournal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joon Hee LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jong Do SeoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Kyunghoon LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun Youn RohDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Yeo-Min YunDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Yong-Wha LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Genetics, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, South Korea.
Sung-Eun ChoDepartment of Endocrine Substance Analysis Center (ESAC), Green Cross Laboratories (GC Labs), Yongin, South Korea.
Junghan SongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seoul National University · KRKonkuk University · KRGreen Cross (South Korea) · KRSoonchunhyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vitamin D (vit-D) deficiency is highly prevalent in the Korean population, highlighting the need for accurate measurements. In this study, the interferences by endogenous and cross-reactive substances were compared between routine vit-D immunoassays and mass spectrometry (MS) methods. Methods: Two MS methods and 4 immunoassays from different manufacturers (Abbott, Beckman Coulter, Roche, Siemens) were compared. Residual samples that were icteric, lipemic, hemolyzed, high in rheumatoid factor, from myeloma patients, or patients undergoing hemodialysis were collected. Also, 4 levels of National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference Material 972a, and 12 samples serially spiked with 3-epi-25-OH-D Results: Significant interferences were observed in hemolytic (Roche), icteric (Beckman and Siemens) and lipemic samples (all 4 immunoassays). Level 4 NIST material and 3-epi-25-OH-D Conclusion: Most observed interferences were consistent with manufacturers' claims, but overall improvement of immunoassay bias limits is required. Awareness of potential interference is important to increase the accuracy of vit-D measurements. Moreover, care is due when interpreting vit-D results of newborns, infants and less commonly, pregnant women, who are known to have physiologically high levels of the highly cross-reactive 3-epi-25-OH-D

Indexed as

3-epi-25-OH-Vitamin D3Analytical interferenceImmunoassayMass spectrometryVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID38188654
PMCPMC10770599
OpenAlexW4389580421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.