Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38188623›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024

Evaluating the Reliability of YouTube as a Source of Information for Meniscal Ramp Lesions.

Riccardo D'Ambrosi, Alessandro Annibaldi, Alessandro Carrozzo, Thais Dutra Vieira, Jae-Sung An, Benjamin Freychet, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Informational Quality of YouTube Content on Partial Meniscectomy Remains Inadequate.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Riccardo D'AmbrosiIRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro AnnibaldiOrthopaedic Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro CarrozzoOrthopaedic Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Thais Dutra VieiraCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Hopital Mermoz, Groupe Ramsay, Lyon, France.
Jae-Sung AnCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Hopital Mermoz, Groupe Ramsay, Lyon, France.
Benjamin FreychetCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Hopital Mermoz, Groupe Ramsay, Lyon, France.
Bertrand Sonnery-CottetCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Hopital Mermoz, Groupe Ramsay, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Videos uploaded to YouTube do not go through a review process, and therefore, videos related to medial meniscal ramp lesions may have little educational value. Purpose: To assess the educational quality of YouTube videos regarding ramp lesions of the meniscus. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: A standard search was performed on the YouTube website using the following terms: "ramp lesion" and "posterior meniscal detachment" and "ramp" and "meniscocapsular" and "meniscotibial detachment," and the top 100 videos based on the number of views were included for analysis. The video duration, publication data, and number of likes and views were retrieved, and the videos were categorized based on video source (health professionals, orthopaedic company, private user), the type of information (anatomy, biomechanics, clinical examination, overview, radiologic, surgical technique), and video content (education, patient support, patient experience/testimony).The content analysis of the information on the videos was evaluated with the use of the DISCERN instrument (score range, 16-80), the Results: A total of 74 videos were included. Of these videos, 70 (94.6%) were published by health professionals, while the remaining 4 (5.4%) were published by orthopaedic companies. Most of the videos were about surgical technique (n = 36; 48.6%) and all had an educational aim (n = 74; 100%). The mean length of the videos was 10.35 ± 17.65 minutes, and the mean online period was 18.64 ± 13.85 months. The mean DISCERN score, Conclusion: The educational content of YouTube regarding medial meniscal ramp lesions showed low quality and validity based on DISCERN score,

Indexed as

kneemeniscotibial detachmentmeniscusrampYouTube

Identifiers

PMID38188623
PMCPMC10768595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.