ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
Effect of forest planting patterns on the formation of soil organic carbon during litter lignocellulose degradation from a microbial perspective.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of convertingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Litter decomposition is an important source of soil organic carbon, and it plays a key role in maintaining the stability of forest ecosystems. The microbial mechanism of soil organic carbon (SOC) formation in different urban forest planting patterns during litter lignocellulose degradation is still unclear. The key genes, microbes, and metabolites in the process of lignocellulose degradation and SOC formation were determined by metagenomics and metabolomics in different litter decomposition layers and soil layers in different urban forest planting patterns, including three types of broadleaf forests (BP forests), three types of coniferous forests (CP forests), and two types of mixed coniferous and broadleaf forests (MCBP forests). The results indicated that the cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin concentrations from the undecomposed layer to the totally decomposed layer decreased by 70.07, 86.83, and 73.04% for CP litter; 74.30, 93.80, and 77.55% for BP litter; and 62.51, 48.58, and 90.61% for MCBP litter, respectively. The soil organic carbon of the BP forests and MCBP forests was higher than that of the CP forests by 38.06 and 94.43% for the 0-10 cm soil layer and by 38.55 and 20.87% for the 10-20 cm soil layer, respectively. Additionally, the gene abundances of glycoside hydrolases (GHs) and polysaccharide lyases (PLs) in the BP forests were higher than those in the MCBP forests and CP forests. Amino acid metabolism, sugar metabolism, TCA metabolism, and cAMP signaling metabolism were mainly between the CP forests and BP forests, while the TCA cycle, pyruvate metabolism, phenylalanine metabolism, and tyrosine metabolism were mainly between the BP forests and MCBP forests during litter decomposition. Additionally, ammonia nitrogen and hemicellulose were key factors driving SOC formation in the CP forests, while ammonia nitrogen, hemicellulose, and lignocellulose-degrading genes were key factors driving SOC formation in the BP forests. For the MCBP forests, cellulose, pH, ammonia nitrogen, and lignin were key factors driving SOC formation. Our findings revealed that the BP forests and MCBP forests had stronger lignocellulose degradation performance in the formation of SOC. This study provided a theoretical basis for the flow and transformation of nutrients in different urban forest management patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.