ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2024
A case of ECPELLA-supported treatment for post-infarction cardiac rupture.
Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nonsurgical Management of Postinfarction Left Ventricular Free Wall Rupture With a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficacy and risk of a combination of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella (Abiomed, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA), an approach known as ECPELLA, for post-infarction cardiac rupture is unclear. We describe the case of a 72-year-old man who presented with acute myocardial infarction. The patient was managed with ECPELLA because of hemodynamic compromise. One week later, there was a sudden increase in venous oxygen saturation. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed ventricular septal rupture, and free wall rupture. Intraventricular thrombus was also observed despite standard anticoagulation therapy. Even with double cardiac rupture, ECPELLA could facilitate left ventricular unloading and sustain hemodynamics. However, because of the risk of device failure due to thrombus aspiration into the Impella, the patient underwent repair surgery. Postoperatively, the patient was temporarily weaned off ECPELLA, and his hemodynamics deteriorated again, and he finally died. Learning objectives: ECPELLA can effectively stabilize the hemodynamics in cases of post-infarction cardiac rupture. However, there are still challenges to address, such as determining optimal ventricular reloading and ECPELLA management for intraventricular thrombus prevention. When using ECPELLA to delay surgery for post-infarction cardiac rupture, it is crucial to strike a balance between hemodynamic stabilization and avoiding potential serious complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.