Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38188242›Full record

ArticleAccess microbiology2023

Competition and co-association, but not phosphorous availability, shape the benefits of phosphate-solubilizing root bacteria for maize (

Joseph Williamson, Andrew Charles Matthews, Ben Raymond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Access microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph WilliamsonDepartment of Life Sciences, Silwood Park campus, Imperial College London, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-5386
Andrew Charles MatthewsDepartment of Life Sciences, Silwood Park campus, Imperial College London, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0271-9636
Ben RaymondDepartment of Life Sciences, Silwood Park campus, Imperial College London, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3730-0985
University of Exeter · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the conditions under which rhizobacteria benefit plant growth remains challenging. Here we tested the hypothesis that benefits from inoculation with phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria will depend upon two environmental conditions: phosphate availability and competition between bacteria. We used maize-associated rhizobacteria with varying phosphate solubilization ability in experiments in soil, sterilized soil and gnotobiotic microcosms under conditions of varying orthophosphate availability, while we manipulated the intensity of competition by varying the number of isolates in plant inocula. Growth promotion by microbes did not depend on phosphate availability but was affected by interactions between inoculants: the beneficial effects of one

Indexed as

bacterial community assemblyPGPRplant growth promotionplant microcosmplant mutualistsrhizobacteria

Identifiers

PMID38188242
PMCPMC10765048
OpenAlexW4389500393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.