Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38188157›Full record

SynthesisPeerJ2024

Systematic review of residual toxicity studies of pesticides to bees and veracity of guidance on pesticide labels.

Leah Swanson, Andony Melathopoulos, Matthew Bucy

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leah SwansonOregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
Andony MelathopoulosDepartment of Horticulture, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
Matthew BucyOregon Department of Agriculture, Salem, OR, United States of America.
Oregon State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residues of pesticides on crops can result in mortality to foraging bees. Pesticide applicators in the U.S. encounter a statement on pesticide labels, which coarsely indicate which products dissipate over the course of an evening. There is reason to suspect that these statements may not align with residual toxicity data, given previous findings. Without a complete database of residual toxicity estimates; however, it is not possible to determine whether the residual toxicity components of statements on pesticide labels similarly diverge from published studies. We compiled 50 studies on residual toxicity trials with formulated pesticides and calculated the residual time to 25% mortality (RT

Indexed as

Biological AssayPesticidesAnimalsBeesCrops, AgriculturalDatabases, FactualProduct LabelingUnited StatesPesticidesBeesEnvironmental protection agencyPesticidesResidual toxicitySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38188157
PMCPMC10771081
OpenAlexW4390572201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.