Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38188050›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2023

The influence of peer's social networks on adolescent's cannabis use: a systematic review of longitudinal studies.

María-Carmen Torrejón-Guirado, Miguel Ángel Baena-Jiménez, Marta Lima-Serrano, Hein de Vries, Liesbeth Mercken

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Does the total consumption model apply to cannabis use?Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

María-Carmen Torrejón-GuiradoDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Miguel Ángel Baena-JiménezDepartment of General and Specialist Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
Marta Lima-SerranoDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Podiatry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Hein de VriesDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Liesbeth MerckenDepartment of Health Psychology, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESOpen University of the Netherlands · NLUniversidad de Sevilla · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: A systematic review was performed to summarize the key findings of the peer influence on cannabis use through Social Network Analysis (SNA) studies and identify limitations and gaps with the purpose of informing future research and practice. Longitudinal studies were included since they provide robust information about social relationships change over time. Background: Adolescents' cannabis use is a global problem, which has awakened an interest in its determinants such as social influences. Research has shown the importance of these influences on cannabis uptake and use. SNA is an useful relational approach to examine socialization mechanisms related to the onset of cannabis use in adolescents. Method: A search was conducted in PyscINFO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for longitudinal articles published until February 2023, to examine cannabis use and peer's social networks. We focus on peers' influence of peers on cannabis use. Additionally, information about effect of cannabis use for peer selection was collected. Results: The results of the included studies ( Conclusion: Cannabis use is mainly related to friends' use. Yet, future studies are warranted to control for relevant selection effects to further knowledge on network effects on cannabis use, improving the design, and improving the modeling of the network. This systematic review may inform about the critical aspects of preventing cannabis use among adolescents, taking into consideration their complex social environment.

Indexed as

adolescentscannabisfriendshippeer influencesocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID38188050
PMCPMC10768034
OpenAlexW4390056222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.