Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38188049›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Digital technology and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review with a focus on depression, anxiety, stress, and trauma.

Paul C Guest, Veronika Vasilevska, Ayoub Al-Hamadi, Julia Eder, Peter Falkai, Johann Steiner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul C GuestDepartment of Psychiatry, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Veronika VasilevskaDepartment of Psychiatry, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Ayoub Al-HamadiDepartment of Neuro-Information Technology, Institute for Information Technology and Communications Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Julia EderDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Peter FalkaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Johann Steiner *Department of Psychiatry, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sudden appearance and devastating effects of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the need for multiple adaptive changes in societies, business operations and healthcare systems across the world. This review describes the development and increased use of digital technologies such as chat bots, electronic diaries, online questionnaires and even video gameplay to maintain effective treatment standards for individuals with mental health conditions such as depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress syndrome. We describe how these approaches have been applied to help meet the challenges of the pandemic in delivering mental healthcare solutions. The main focus of this narrative review is on describing how these digital platforms have been used in diagnostics, patient monitoring and as a treatment option for the general public, as well as for frontline medical staff suffering with mental health issues.

Indexed as

anxietyAPPchat botCOVID-19depressionelectronic diarygameplayPTSD

Identifiers

PMID38188049
PMCPMC10766703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.