ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2024
Anthropometric Changes During Pregnancy and Their Association with Adequacy of Gestational Weight Gain.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of digital anthropometric measurements during pregnancy: a longitudinal study.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Article
- Accuracy of Digital Anthropometry During Pregnancy: A Longitudinal Study.Research square · 2025Article
- Anthropometric Measurements and Laboratory Methods for Pregnancy: An Update Review to Evaluation of Body Composition.Current nutrition reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Gestational weight gain (GWG) is an expected component of a healthy pregnancy. Gaining weight within the recommended range helps support the mother's health by providing energy reserves and nutrients to meet the increased metabolic demands during pregnancy. Too much or too little GWG has been associated with adverse health outcomes for the mother and child. Objective: The objective of the study was to examine how changes in anthropometric indicators during pregnancy, including fat gain, vary, compare changes among body mass index (BMI) (kg/m Methods: Data came from a cohort of 360 pregnant women with measured anthropometric indicators (weight, midupper arm circumference, and skin folds of the triceps, thigh, and upper iliac) at <12-, 16 to 22-, and 28 to 32-wks of gestation. Fat gain was calculated using a formula. Analysis of variance was used to test for differences in anthropometric changes by BMI and adequacy of GWG in the third trimester. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine associations between changes in anthropometric indicators and GWG recommendations. Results: Women with normal weight had greater increases in all anthropometric indicators, which differed from women with obesity, who had negative changes and gained less weight. Women who gained inadequately (21%) had negative changes that were all less, compared with women who gained adequately (46%) (except in upper iliac) or excessively (34%). Women with BMI of >25 who gained adequately also had negative changes. Logistic regression results indicated that changes in midupper arm circumference, triceps, and thigh skin folds, and fat gain were all inversely associated with inadequate GWG, whereas all indicators were positively associated with excessive GWG. Conclusions: Anthropometric changes during pregnancy differ by BMI and are associated with adequacy of GWG. Women who gained adequately had minimal fat gain, lending support for current GWG guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.