Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187971›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023

Utility of VExUS score in the peri-operative care unit, intensive care unit, and emergency setting - A systematic review.

Bhavna Gupta, Pallavi Ahluwalia, Anish Gupta, Nikhil Ranjan, Kamna Kakkar, Parag Aneja

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fluid tolerance in septic shock: Femoral vein pulsatility versus VExUS score in a cross-sectional study.The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bhavna GuptaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3108-0408
Pallavi AhluwaliaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8730-3730
Anish GuptaDepartment of Cardio Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4704-6271
Nikhil RanjanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7964-2392
Kamna KakkarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8448-9450
Parag AnejaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8932-7998
All India Institute of Medical Sciences RishikeshSafdarjang Hospital · INTeerthanker Mahaveer Medical College & Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: The venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) score presents a prospect of valuable clinical utility. The study aimed to systematically review the effectiveness of the VExUS score in detecting venous congestion across emergency, critical care, and peri-operative contexts; assessing its utility in improved patient outcomes; and exploring its relationship with established parameters. Methods: This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023421034). A comprehensive literature search, employing pre-defined search terms related to the VExUS score in diverse clinical contexts, was conducted on articles published between 2000 and 15 May 2023 across databases- PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, Scopus, Elsevier Clinical Key, and Google Scholar. Bias risk assessment was carried out using the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies tool. Given the significant heterogeneity across studies concerning participants, interventions, outcomes, and study designs, data pooling for a meaningful meta-analysis was not feasible. Results: The review included 15 articles comprising observational studies, case series, and case reports. Most patients exhibited moderate-to-severe venous congestion based on their baseline VExUS scores. Higher VExUS scores correlated with a greater risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in post-operative patients. The VExUS score strongly correlated with central venous pressure; specific components, such as the intra-renal monophasic pattern, portal-pulsatility, and inferior vena cava diameter, exhibited robust predictive value for venous congestion. Conclusion: VExUS score is valuable in assessing and predicting venous congestion, especially regarding AKI prediction risk and guiding interventions. However, its utility in predicting outcomes in acute heart failure patients appears less certain.

Indexed as

Intensive care unitmortalitypatient outcomesperi-operative settingvenous congestionvenous excess ultrasound scoreVExUS

Identifiers

PMID38187971
PMCPMC10768914
OpenAlexW4390689732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.