Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187952›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2024

An Expedited Sling Immobilization Protocol After Isolated Biceps Tenodesis Results in Clinical and Patient-Reported Postoperative Outcomes Equivalent to a Standard Rehabilitation Protocol.

Mark A Glover, Alexis Restrepo, Andrew J Recker, Edward C Beck, Garrett S Bullock, Nicholas A Trasolini, Brian R Waterman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark A GloverWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Alexis RestrepoWake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Andrew J ReckerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Edward C BeckDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Garrett S BullockDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Nicholas A TrasoliniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Brian R WatermanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize clinical and patient-reported outcomes for patients after isolated biceps tenodesis (BT) who underwent either standard or expedited sling immobilization protocols following surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared patients who were assigned to use a sling for either 4 to 6 weeks (standard) or 0 to 2 weeks (expedited) following an isolated BT. Primary endpoint included rate of re-rupture, surgical revision, loss of fixation, and Popeye deformity. Secondary endpoints included shoulder range of motion (ROM) as well as pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of pain and function. Missing data were managed via multiple imputation with chained equations. Complication prevalence 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Clopper Pearson method and a series of hierarchical mixed effects linear regressions were performed to assess differences between sling interventions in PROs and ROM. Results: The average age of the standard cohort (n = 66) was 49 years (±14 years), and the average age of the expedited cohort (n = 69) was 47 years (±14 years). The expedited and standardized cohorts demonstrated 0.4 and 0.3 complications per 10,000 exposure days, respectively, with no significant difference between groups (1.4 [95% confidence interval 0.2-10.0], Conclusions: No statistically significant difference in the rate of re-rupture, surgical revision, loss of fixation, or Popeye deformity was noted between protocols after isolated BT. Furthermore, there were no clinically significant differences in ROM or PROs identified between protocols after isolated BT. This study suggests that patients who have undergone isolated BT may safely discontinue sling use within 2 weeks after surgery. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Identifiers

PMID38187952
PMCPMC10770724
OpenAlexW4389904566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.