Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187933›Full record

ArticleAnnual Conference & Exposition : final program and proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education2023

Innovations in Remote Teaching of Engineering Design Teams.

Soyoung Kang, Erin Abu-Rish Blakeney, Ken Yasuhara, Kathleen E Kearney, Shayla Payne, Eric Seibel, Jonathan T C Liu, Per Reinhall, Jonathan Posner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual Conference & Exposition : final program and proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Soyoung KangUniversity of Washington.
Erin Abu-Rish BlakeneyUniversity of Washington.
Ken YasuharaUniversity of Washington.
Kathleen E KearneyUniversity of Washington.
Shayla PayneUniversity of Washington.
Eric SeibelUniversity of Washington.
Jonathan T C LiuUniversity of Washington.
Per ReinhallUniversity of Washington.
Jonathan PosnerUniversity of Washington.

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The University of Washington's Engineering Innovation in Health program is a yearlong engineering design course sequence where senior undergraduate and graduate engineering students across different disciplines work in teams with health professionals to address their unmet needs. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, these team- and project-based courses shifted from an in-person to remote course environment. Here, we share innovative teaching strategies for a team-based, remote course environment. We show how this shift affected productivity by comparing survey results from before (in person) and during (remote) the pandemic. Preliminary results show that overall project outcomes and productivity were as high or, in some cases, higher during the pandemic than prior to the pandemic. These findings suggest that the innovative remote teaching strategies implemented by the teaching team provided effective options in the absence of certain hands-on experiences that are considered critical to engineering capstone design courses. A discussion on these teaching strategies in the context beyond the pandemic are considered in the discussion.

Identifiers

PMID38187933
PMCPMC10766643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.