Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187847›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of surgical oncology2023

NLP AI Models for Optimizing Medical Research: Demystifying the Concerns.

Karthik Nagaraja Rao, Ripu Daman Arora, Prajwal Dange, Nitin M Nagarkar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karthik Nagaraja RaoDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492099 India.ORCID 0000-0002-1420-7366
Ripu Daman AroraDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India.
Prajwal DangeDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492099 India.
Nitin M NagarkarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural language processing (NLP) AI models have gained popularity in research; however, ethical considerations are necessary to avoid potential negative consequences. This paper identifies and explores the key areas of ethical concern for researchers using NLP AI models, such as bias in training data and algorithms, plagiarism, data privacy, accuracy of generated content, prompt and content generation, and training data quality. To mitigate bias, researchers should use diverse training data and regularly evaluate models for potential biases. Proper attribution and privacy protection are essential when using AI-generated content, while accuracy should be regularly tested and evaluated. Specific and appropriate prompts, algorithms, and techniques should be used for content generation, and training data quality should be high, diverse, and updated regularly. Finally, appropriate authorship credit and avoidance of conflicts of interest must be ensured. Adherence to ethical standards, such as those outlined by ICMJE, is crucial. These ethical considerations are vital for ensuring the quality and integrity of NLP AI model research and avoiding negative consequences.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceAuthorshipChatGPTEthicsMedical research

Identifiers

PMID38187847
PMCPMC10767031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.