ReviewIndian journal of surgical oncology2023
NLP AI Models for Optimizing Medical Research: Demystifying the Concerns.
Review in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the reliability and quality of lupus nephritis educational content on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional content analysis.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- The Limitations of Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Oncology.Advances in therapy · 2025Review
- Classification of psychiatry clinical notes by diagnosis: a deep learning and machine learning approach.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural language processing (NLP) AI models have gained popularity in research; however, ethical considerations are necessary to avoid potential negative consequences. This paper identifies and explores the key areas of ethical concern for researchers using NLP AI models, such as bias in training data and algorithms, plagiarism, data privacy, accuracy of generated content, prompt and content generation, and training data quality. To mitigate bias, researchers should use diverse training data and regularly evaluate models for potential biases. Proper attribution and privacy protection are essential when using AI-generated content, while accuracy should be regularly tested and evaluated. Specific and appropriate prompts, algorithms, and techniques should be used for content generation, and training data quality should be high, diverse, and updated regularly. Finally, appropriate authorship credit and avoidance of conflicts of interest must be ensured. Adherence to ethical standards, such as those outlined by ICMJE, is crucial. These ethical considerations are vital for ensuring the quality and integrity of NLP AI model research and avoiding negative consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.