Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187836›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of surgical oncology2023

Standardizing the Head and Neck Cancer Treatment and Research.

Karthik Nagaraja Rao, Ripu Daman Arora, Prajwal Dange, Nitin M Nagarkar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karthik Nagaraja RaoMCh Head Neck Surgery and Oncology, Department of Head and Neck Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1420-7366
Ripu Daman AroraDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India.
Prajwal DangeMCh Head Neck Surgery and Oncology, Department of Head and Neck Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India.
Nitin M NagarkarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head and neck cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach, with standardized care being essential for consistent, high-quality treatment. Standardization involves evidence-based guidelines and protocols, and collaboration is necessary for research and improving outcomes. However, collaboration can be challenging due to various barriers. Collaboration can improve care by facilitating sharing of knowledge, access to technology, clinical trials, data sharing, funding and education. To improve collaboration, a shared vision, communication channels, guidelines, centralized database, training programs, culture of collaboration and funding should be established.

Indexed as

CollaborationHead and neck cancerStandardization

Identifiers

PMID38187836
PMCPMC10766926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.