Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187830›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2023

The "Watch and Wait" Method After Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer Requiring Abdominoperineal Resection.

Naruhiko Sawada, Shumpei Mukai, Yusuke Takehara, Masashi Misawa, Toyoki Kudo, Takemasa Hayashi, Kunihiko Wakamura, Yuta Enami, Hideyuki Miyachi, Toshiyuki Baba and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naruhiko SawadaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9062-6650
Shumpei MukaiDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan.
Yusuke TakeharaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan.
Masashi MisawaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan.
Toyoki KudoDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan.
Takemasa HayashiDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan.
Kunihiko WakamuraDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan.
Yuta EnamiDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan.
Hideyuki MiyachiDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan.
Toshiyuki BabaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan.
Fumio IshidaDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan.
Shin-Ei KudoDigestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan.
Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study examined the therapeutic effects of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) and predictive factors for complete clinical remission, compared the prognosis and costs of abdominoperineal resection (APR) and the "watch and wait" method (WW), and evaluated the usefulness of WW. In our department, patients with stage II-III lower rectal cancer requiring APR receive NACRT. NACRT was performed as a preoperative treatment (52 Gy + S-1: 80-120 mg/day × 25 days). Eight weeks after the completion of NACRT, rectal examination, endoscopic, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings were evaluated to assess its therapeutic effects. APR was indicated for patients in whom endoscopic findings suggested a residual tumor in which a deep ulcer or marginal swelling remained or lymph node metastasis. However, WW was selected for patients who refused APR after informed consent was obtained. In the APR and WW groups, 5- and 20-year treatment costs after CRT were calculated using the Medical Fee Points of Japan in 2020. No significant differences were observed in 3-year disease-free survival rates for either parameter between the two groups. Regarding expenses, treatment costs were lower in the WW group than in the APR group. Organ preservation using active surveillance with CRT for rectal cancer requiring APR is feasible with the achievement of endoluminal complete remission.

Indexed as

Abdominoperineal resectionComplete remissionNeoadjuvant chemoradiation therapyRectal cancerWatch and wait

Identifiers

PMID38187830
PMCPMC10767130
OpenAlexW4387607527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.