Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187778›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Combining transcutaneous spinal stimulation and functional electrical stimulation increases force generated by lower limbs: When more is more.

Alexander G Steele, Albert H Vette, Catherine Martin, Kei Masani, Dimitry G Sayenko

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander G SteeleDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6550 Fannin Street, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5007-0638
Albert H VetteDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alberta, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, 9211-116 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1H9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2543-568X
Catherine MartinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6550 Fannin Street, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America.
Kei MasaniInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0207-3241
Dimitry G SayenkoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6550 Fannin Street, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America.
Houston Methodist · USAlberta Health Services · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

Harnessing Neuroplasticity of Postural Sensorimotor Networks Using Non-Invasive Spinal Neuromodulation to Maximize Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS119587 · NINDS · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Dimitry Sayenko · 2022 to 2026
$3.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS119587
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation (TSS) has been shown to promote activation of the lower limb and trunk muscles and is being actively explored for improving the motor outcomes of people with neurological conditions. However, individual responses to TSS vary, and often the muscle responses are insufficient to produce enough force for self-supported standing. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) can activate individual muscles and assist in closing this functional gap, but it introduces questions regarding timing between modalities. Methods: To assess the effects of TSS and FES on force generation, ten neurologically intact participants underwent (1) TSS only, (2) FES only, and (3) TSS + FES. TSS was delivered using four electrodes placed at T10-T11 through the L1-L2 intervertebral spaces simultaneously, while FES was delivered to the skin over the right knee extensors and plantarflexors. For all conditions, TSS and FES were delivered using three 0.5 ms biphasic square-wave pulses at 15 Hz. During the TSS + FES condition, timing between the two modalities was adjusted in increments of ¼ time between pulses (16.5 ms). Results: When TSS preceded FES, a larger force production was observed. We also determined several changes in muscle activation amplitude at different relative stimulus intervals, which help characterize our finding and indicate the facilitating and inhibitory effects of the modalities. Conclusions: Utilizing a delay ranging from 15 to 30 ms between stimuli resulted in higher mean force generation in both the knee and ankle joints, regardless of the selected FES location (Average; knee: 112.0%, ankle: 103.1%).

Identifiers

PMID38187778
PMCPMC10769419
OpenAlexW4390154079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.