ArticleCardiology research2023
Is the Blood Pressure-Enabled Smartwatch Ready to Drive Precision Medicine? Supporting Findings From a Validation Study.
Article in Cardiology research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wearable Devices for Remote Monitoring of Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of blood pressure measurements between the Huawei Watch D smartwatch application and the validated Omron M3 Intellisense device: Observational study.Experimental physiology · 2026Observational
- Digital hypertension in 2024-2025: emerging evidence and future directions.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- The quest for accurate wearable blood pressure monitors.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Article
- Validation of the DBP-8278B Wrist-type Fully Automatic Blood Pressure Monitor in the general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020 protocol.Blood pressure monitoring · 2025Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of the HUAWEI WATCH D for measuring spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during elective cesarean section: a diagnostic test.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The popular wrist-worn wearables recording a variety of health metrics such as blood pressure (BP) in real time could play a potential role to advance precision medicine, but these devices are often insufficiently validated for their performance to enhance confidence in its use across diverse populations. The accuracy of BP-enabled smartwatch is assessed among the multi-ethnic Malaysians, and findings is discussed in comparison with conventional automated upper-arm BP device. Methods: Validation procedures followed the guidelines by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018). Quota sampling was employed to obtain eligible patients with normal and abnormal BP as per guideline. The measurements of BP were taken at wrist using HUAWEI WATCH D (test BP); and the readings were assessed against reference BP by the mercury sphygmomanometer. Agreement statistics and linear regression analyses were performed. Results: BP measurements (234 data pairs) from 78 patients that fulfilled AAMI/ESH/ISO protocol were analyzed. The BP readings taken by the HUAWEI WATCH D were comparable to reference BP by sphygmomanometer based on 1) Criterion 1: systolic blood pressure (SBP) = -0.034 (SD 5.24) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) = -0.65 (SD 4.66) mm Hg; and 2) Criterion 2: SBPs = -0.034 (SD 4.18) and DBPs = -0.65 (SD 3.94) mm Hg. Factors of sociodemographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, cardiovascular comorbidities, and wrist hair density were not significantly associated with the mean BP differences. Conclusions: HUAWEI WATCH D fulfilled criteria 1 and 2 of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) guidelines. It can be recommended for clinical use across a wider population. The rich data from real-time BP measurements in concurrent with other health-related parameters recorded by the smartwatch wearable offer opportunities to drive precision medicine in tackling therapeutic inertia by personalizing BP control regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.