Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187508›Full record

ArticleResearch in autism spectrum disorders2023

Barriers to an Autistic Identity: How RRBs may Contribute to the Underdiagnosis of Females.

Emily Cary, Aparajita Rao, Erin Stephanie Misato Matsuba, Natalie Russo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in autism spectrum disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily CaryDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244 2340.
Aparajita RaoDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244 2340.
Erin Stephanie Misato MatsubaDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244 2340.
Natalie RussoDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, 430 Huntington Hall, Syracuse, NY 13244 2340.
Syracuse University · US

Funding

The neurophysiology of sensory processing and multisensory integration in ASDR01MH101536 · NIMH · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI RUSSO, NATALIE · 2013 to 2017
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autistic females are frequently underdiagnosed, misdiagnosed, and/or diagnosed later in life. Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors (RRBs) are increasingly critical for diagnosis and yet are commonly rated lower in females. Whether this reflects genuinely lower levels of these traits, or if female-typical RRBs have a different phenotypic presentation that may not register on current quantitative measurement tools is unclear. Methods: Twenty-one autistic females and 21 autistic males matched on chronological age and FSIQ completed the AQ, ADOS-2, and ADI-R. Items from the ADOS-2 and ADI-R were selected that were relevant to the four areas of restricted and repetitive behavior in the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria of autism. Using a mixed-methods analytical approach, scores and comments on these measures were compared between sexes to better characterize RRBs in autistic females. Results: There were no sex differences on the AQ, which broadly assesses autistic traits. When analyzed by the four DSM-5 RRB criteria, there were no sex differences on the ADI-R when using traditional algorithm scoring that narrows questions down to those that are more sensitive and specific in capturing autism in research samples with a high proportion of males. When incorporating additional items relevant to the DSM-5 to identify sex changes in a broader pool of items, females scored higher on stereotyped movements and speech. Females also engaged in more sensory behaviors during the ADOS-2. Qualitative analyses indicated that females were more likely to engage in stereotyped body rocking and spinning, stereotyped behaviors when anxious, to show major reactions to changes, repetitive language including listing and counting, and sensory behaviors, especially in the tactile domain. Conclusion: Exploratory findings highlight sex differences in RRBs that may help enhance diagnostic clarity for females. Higher tactile sensory behaviors in females suggests there may be increased diagnostic sensitivity for females with the updated DSM-5 that now includes sensory components as part of the diagnostic criteria.

Indexed as

autistic identitydiagnosisfemalesRRBssensory

Identifiers

PMID38187508
PMCPMC10768999
OpenAlexW4388408403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.