ArticleWorld neurosurgery: X2024
Clinical presentation, role of surgery and prognosis in spinal astrocytoma: Cohort study.
Article in World neurosurgery: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal astrocytoma is a rare neoplasm with discouraging prognosis, which accounts for 6-8 % of total intramedullary spinal tumors. As this is a rare entity, details of the clinical and molecular features have not been fully unraveled. We evaluated the radiologic findings, perioperative clinical presentation, histopathological features and treatment response in a single institution series of 37 consecutive cases of spinal astrocytomas (WHO grades 1 to 4). We identified 8, 16, 8, and 5 patients with grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 lesions, respectively, from 1988 to 2017. Peak ages were youngest in grade 1, followed in order by grades 4, 3 and 2. Whereas all cases of grade 1 and 4 enhanced with contrast, less than half of the cases of grade 2 tumors enhanced (44 %). Grade 3 tumors had a higher rate of multiplicity at presentation (50 %). A concomitant brain lesion at presentation was present in 14 % and 43 % of grade 2 and 3 lesions, respectively. Progression-free and overall survival were worse in grades 3 and 4 compared to grade 2 lesions but no significant difference was observed between grade 3 and 4. Many patients (16-of-36) experienced new neurological deficits postoperatively regardless of grade. Most patients (88 %) required postoperative rehabilitation, and 61 % were not discharged to home. Discharge destination closely correlated with age (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.