Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187407›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2023

A systematic review of cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions for comorbid chronic pain and clinically relevant psychological distress.

Juan P Sanabria-Mazo, Ariadna Colomer-Carbonell, Óscar Fernández-Vázquez, Georgina Noboa-Rocamora, Gemma Cardona-Ros, Lance M McCracken, Antonio Montes-Pérez, Juan R Castaño-Asins, Sílvia Edo, Xavier Borràs and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Protection from Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Scoping Review.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Juan P Sanabria-MazoTeaching, Research, and Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
Ariadna Colomer-CarbonellTeaching, Research, and Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
Óscar Fernández-VázquezTeaching, Research, and Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
Georgina Noboa-RocamoraTeaching, Research, and Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
Gemma Cardona-RosTeaching, Research, and Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
Lance M McCrackenPsychology Department, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Antonio Montes-PérezParc de Salut MAR, Barcelona, Spain.
Juan R Castaño-AsinsParc de Salut MAR, Barcelona, Spain.
Sílvia EdoDepartment of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier BorràsDepartment of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Antoni SanzDepartment of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Albert Feliu-SolerCentre for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Juan V LucianoTeaching, Research, and Innovation Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública · ESParc de Salut · ESParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Chronic pain frequently co-occurs with clinically relevant psychological distress. A systematic review was conducted to identify the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy-based interventions for patients with these comorbid conditions. Methods: The systematic search was carried out in Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus up to March 18th, 2023. Four reviewers independently conducted screenings, extraction, and quality assessment. Results: Twelve randomized controlled trials and one non-randomized controlled trial involving 1,661 participants that examined the efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (nine studies), Mindfulness-based Interventions (three studies), Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (one study), and Behavioral Activation Therapy for Depression (one study) were included. Compared to treatment as usual, six out of eight studies of traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy reported significant differences in the reduction of depressive symptoms at post-treatment ( Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy may produce significant benefits for the improvement of depression, anxiety, and quality of life, but not for pain intensity and pain catastrophizing. More evidence is needed to determine the effects of MBI, ACT, and BATD. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42021219921.

Indexed as

anxietychronic paincognitive behavioral therapydepressiondistresssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38187407
PMCPMC10766814
OpenAlexW4390111632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.