Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187356›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2023

Urine metabolomics phenotyping and urinary biomarker exploratory in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Yuye Wang, Yu Sun, Yu Wang, Shuhong Jia, Yanan Qiao, Zhi Zhou, Wen Shao, Xiangfei Zhang, Jing Guo, Xincheng Song and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Metabolomic analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yuye WangChina-Japan Friendship Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yu SunDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yu WangDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shuhong JiaDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yanan QiaoDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhi ZhouDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wen ShaoDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiangfei ZhangDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jing GuoDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xincheng SongDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoqian NiuDepartment of Neurology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Dantao PengChina-Japan Friendship Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking University · CNXijing Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Alzheimer's disease is a prevalent disease with a heavy global burden and is suggested to be a metabolic disease in the brain in recent years. The metabolome is considered to be the most promising phenotype which reflects changes in genetic, transcript, and protein profiles as well as environmental effects. Aiming to obtain a comprehensive understanding and convenient diagnosis of MCI and AD from another perspective, researchers are working on AD metabolomics. Urine is more convenient which could reflect the change of disease at an earlier stage. Thus, we conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate novel diagnostic panels. Methods: We first enrolled participants from China-Japan Friendship Hospital from April 2022 to November 2022, collected urine samples and conducted an LC-MS/MS analysis. In parallel, clinical data were collected and clinical examinations were performed. After statistical and bioinformatics analyzes, significant risk factors and differential urinary metabolites were determined. We attempt to investigate diagnostic panels based on machine learning including LASSO and SVM. Results: Fifty-seven AD patients, 43 MCI patients and 62 CN subjects were enrolled. A total of 2,140 metabolites were identified among which 125 significantly differed between the AD and CN groups, including 46 upregulated ones and 79 downregulated ones. In parallel, there were 93 significant differential metabolites between the MCI and CN groups, including 23 upregulated ones and 70 downregulated ones. AD diagnostic panel (30 metabolites+ age + APOE) achieved an AUC of 0.9575 in the test set while MCI diagnostic panel (45 metabolites+ age + APOE) achieved an AUC of 0.7333 in the test set. Atropine, S-Methyl-L-cysteine-S-oxide, D-Mannose 6-phosphate (M6P), Spiculisporic Acid, N-Acetyl-L-methionine, 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-tetranor Prostaglandin D2, Pyridoxal 5'-Phosphate (PLP) and 17(S)-HpDHA were considered valuable for both AD and MCI diagnosis and defined as hub metabolites. Besides, diagnostic metabolites were weakly correlated with cognitive functions. Discussion: In conclusion, the procedure is convenient, non-invasive, and useful for diagnosis, which could assist physicians in differentiating AD and MCI from CN. Atropine, M6P and PLP were evidence-based hub metabolites in AD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasediagnostic biomarkermachine learningmild cognitive impairmenturine metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID38187356
PMCPMC10768723
OpenAlexW4390102984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.