Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187332›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Cortical surface analysis for focal cortical dysplasia diagnosis by using PET images.

Eric Jacob Bacon, Chaoyang Jin, Dianning He, Shuaishuai Hu, Lanbo Wang, Han Li, Shouliang Qi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric Jacob BaconCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Chaoyang JinCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Dianning HeCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Shuaishuai HuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Lanbo WangDepartment of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Han LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Shouliang QiCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Northeastern University · CNChina Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is a neurological disorder distinguished by faulty brain cell structure and development. Repetitive and uncontrollable seizures may be linked to FCD's aberrant cortical thickness, gyrification, and sulcal depth. Quantitative cortical surface analysis is a crucial alternative to ineffective visual inspection. This study recruited 42 subjects including 22 FCD patients who underwent surgery and 20 healthy controls (HC). For the FCD patients, T1-weighted and PET images were obtained by a PET-MRI scanner, and the confirmed epileptogenic zone (EZ) was collected from postsurgical follow-up. For the HCs, CT and PET images were obtained by a PET-CT scanner. Cortical thickness, gyrification index, and sulcal depth were calculated using a computational anatomical toolbox (CAT12). A cluster-based analysis is carried out to determine each FCD patient's aberrant cortical surface. After parcellating the cerebral cortex into 68 regions by the Desikan-Killiany atlas, a region of interest (ROI) analysis was conducted to know whether the feature in the FCD group is significantly different from that in the HC group. Finally, the features of all ROIs were utilised to train a support vector machine classifier (SVM). The classification performance is evaluated by the leave-one-out cross-validation. The cluster-based analysis can localize the EZ cluster with the highest accuracy of 54.5 % (12/22) for cortical thickness, 40.9 % (9/22) and 13.6 % (3/22) for sulcal depth and gyrification, respectively. Moderate concordance (Kappa, 0.6) is observed between the confirmed EZs and identified clusters by using the cortical thickness. Fair concordance (Kappa, 0.3) and no concordance (Kappa, 0.1) is found by using sulcal depth and gyrification. Significant differences are found in 46 of 68 regions (67.7 %) for the three measures. The trained SVM classifier achieved a prediction accuracy of 95.5 % for the cortical thickness, while the sulcal depth and the gyrification obtained 86.0 % and 81.5 %. Cortical thickness, as determined by quantitative cortical surface analysis of PET data, has a greater ability than sulcal depth and gyrification to locate aberrant EZ clusters in FCD. Surface measures might be different in many regions for FCD and HC. By integrating machine learning and cortical morphologies features, individual prediction of FCD seems to be feasible.

Indexed as

Cortical surface analysisEpileptogenic zoneFDG-PETFocal cortical dysplasiaMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38187332
PMCPMC10770482
OpenAlexW4389609736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.