Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187209›Full record

ArticleSafety and health at work2023

Systematizing Information Use to Address Determinants of Health Worker Health in South Africa: A Cross-sectional Mixed Method Study.

Muzimkhulu Zungu, Annalee Yassi, Jonathan Ramodike, Kuku Voyi, Karen Lockhart, David Jones, Spo Kgalamono, Nkululeko Thunzi, Jerry Spiegel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Safety and health at work, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Muzimkhulu ZunguNational Institute for Occupational Health, A Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Annalee YassiSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jonathan RamodikeNational Institute for Occupational Health, A Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Kuku VoyiSchool of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Karen LockhartSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
David JonesNational Institute for Occupational Health, A Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Spo KgalamonoNational Institute for Occupational Health, A Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Nkululeko ThunziNational Institute for Occupational Health, A Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jerry SpiegelSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
National Health Laboratory Service · ZAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recognizing that access to safe and healthy working conditions is a human right, the World Health Organization (WHO) calls for specific occupational safety and health (OSH) programs for health workers (HWs). The WHO health systems' building blocks, and the International Labour Organization (ILO), highlight the importance of information as part of effective systems. This study examined how OSH stakeholders access, use, and value an occupational health information system (OHIS). Methods: A cross-sectional survey of OSH stakeholders was conducted as part of a larger quasi experimental study in four teaching hospitals. The study hospitals and participants were purposefully selected and data collected using a modified questionnaire with both closed and open-ended questions. Quantitative analysis was conducted and themes identified for qualitative analysis. Ethics approval was provided by the University of Pretoria and University of British Columbia. Results: There were 71 participants comprised of hospital managers, health and safety representatives, trade unions representatives and OSH professionals. At least 42% reported poor accessibility and poor timeliness of OHIS for decision-making. Only 50% had access to computers and 27% reported poor computer skills. When existing, OHIS was poorly organized and needed upgrades, with 85% reporting the need for significant reforms. Only 45% reported use of OHIS for decision-making in their OSH role. Conclusion: Given the gap in access and utilization of information needed to protect worker's rights to a safe and healthy workplace, more attention is warranted to OHIS development and use as well as education and training in South Africa and beyond.

Indexed as

Health information systemHealth workersInformation systemOccupational healthWorker rights

Identifiers

PMID38187209
PMCPMC10770277
OpenAlexW4387955448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.