Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187170›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024

Survey on fan-beam computed tomography for radiotherapy: Current implementation and future perspectives of motion management and surface guidance devices.

Chrysi Papalazarou, Sima Qamhiyeh, Robert Kaatee, Joke De Rouck, Esther Decabooter, Guido C Hilgers, Koen Salvo, Jacobus van Wingerden, Hilde Bosmans, Brent van der Heyden and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chrysi PapalazarouLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sima QamhiyehDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Robert KaateeRadiotherapy Institute Friesland, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
Joke De RouckDepartment of Radiotherapy, AZ Sint Lucas, Ghent, Belgium.
Esther DecabooterDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Guido C HilgersRadiotherapiegroep, Arnhem/Deventer, the Netherlands.
Koen SalvoDepartment of Radiotherapy, AZ Sint-Maarten, Mechelen, Belgium.
Jacobus van WingerdenDepartment of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Leidschendam, the Netherlands.
Hilde BosmansDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Brent van der HeydenDepartment of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Geert PittomvilsDepartment of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Evelien BogaertDepartment of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: This work reports on the results of a survey performed on the use of computed tomography (CT) imaging for motion management, surface guidance devices, and their quality assurance (QA). Additionally, it details the collected user insights regarding professional needs in CT for radiotherapy. The purpose of the survey is to understand current practice, professional needs and future directions in the field of fan-beam CT in radiation therapy (RT). Materials and methods: An online institutional survey was conducted between 1-Sep-2022 and 10-Oct-2022 among medical physics experts at Belgian and Dutch radiotherapy institutions, to assess the current status, challenges, and future directions of motion management and surface image-guided radiotherapy. The survey consisted of a maximum of 143 questions, with the exact number depending on participants' responses. Results: The response rate was 66 % (31/47). Respiratory management was reported as standard practice in all but one institution; surface imaging during CT-simulation was reported in ten institutions. QA procedures are applied with varying frequencies and methodologies, primarily with commercial anatomy-like phantoms. Surface guidance users report employing commercial static and dynamic phantoms. Four main subjects are considered clinically important by the respondents: surface guidance, CT protocol optimisation, implementing gated imaging (4DCT, breath-hold), and a tattoo-less workflow. Conclusions: The survey highlights the scattered pattern of QA procedures for respiratory motion management, indicating the need for well-defined, unambiguous, and practicable guidelines. Surface guidance is considered one of the most important techniques that should be implemented in the clinical radiotherapy simulation workflow.

Indexed as

4DCTComputed tomographyQuality assuranceRadiotherapySurface guidanceSurvey

Identifiers

PMID38187170
PMCPMC10767488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.