Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38187108›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2024

The Clinical and Pathological Characteristics That Differentiate Cases With "Low Estrogen Receptor Expression" From Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Cem Karaali, Mümin Emiroğlu, Mustafa Değirmenci, Murat Keser, Semra Salimoğlu, Canan Kelten Talu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cem KaraaliDepartment of General Surgery, İzmir Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences Turkey, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2743-7360
Mümin EmiroğluDepartment of Medical Pathology, İzmir Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences Turkey, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6501-6105
Mustafa DeğirmenciDepartment of Medical Oncology, İzmir Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences Turkey, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6988-9205
Murat KeserDepartment of Medical Oncology, İzmir Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences Turkey, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3834-0863
Semra SalimoğluDepartment of General Surgery, İzmir Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences Turkey, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9849-244X
Canan Kelten TaluDepartment of Medical Pathology, İzmir Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences Turkey, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8767-4275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Estrogen receptor (ER) expression is an immunohistochemical marker that is examined in all invasive breast cancers and has prognostic and predictive value. ER-positive breast cancers refer to those that show positivity for ER at 1% cellular expression or higher. The American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines suggest using the term "low ER-positive breast cancer" for tumors with ER expression between 1% and 10%. Low ER-positive breast cancers exhibit similarities, in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival rates, to triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) rather than ER-positive breast cancers. In this study, our aim was to compare the clinicopathological characteristics of low ER-positive breast cancer cases diagnosed and followed in our clinic with TNBCs. Materials and Methods: A total of 26 cases of low ER-positive breast cancer diagnosed at University of Health Sciences Turkey, İzmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital between 2010 and 2016 were retrieved from hospital records. The relevant histopathology slides and blocks were retrieved and re-evaluated retrospectively through microscopic examination. Thirteen cases that met the criteria were included in the study. Additionally, a consecutive series of 13 TNBC cases that did not receive neoadjuvant treatment within the same time period were identified. Results: In the low ER-positive group, the presence of tumor necrosis, as well as histological grade, nuclear grade and Ki-67 proliferation index were significantly lower compared to the TNBC group. Ductal carcinoma Conclusion: Although our study consisted of a small number of cases, some features showed significant differences between low ER-positive breast cancers and TNBCs. Histological and nuclear grades, as well as the presence of a DCIS component, were associated with low ER-positive breast cancer. In contrast, the presence of tumor necrosis, as well as Grade 3 features and a high Ki-67 proliferation index indicated TNBC.

Indexed as

clinicopathological featureshistopathological findingsLow ER-positive breast carcinomasurvivaltriple-negative breast carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID38187108
PMCPMC10765462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.