ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024
Data-driven mathematical and visualization approaches for removing rare features for Compositional Data Analysis (CoDA).
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Twenty-Four-Hour Compositional Data Analysis in Healthcare: Clinical Potential and Future Directions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Influence of menstrual cycle and oral contraception on taxonomic composition and gas production in the gut microbiome.Journal of medical microbiology · 2025Article
- Genetic hypogonadal (Gnrh1bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sparse feature tables, in which many features are present in very few samples, are common in big biological data (e.g. metagenomics). Ignoring issues of zero-laden datasets can result in biased statistical estimates and decreased power in downstream analyses. Zeros are also a particular issue for compositional data analysis using log-ratios since the log of zero is undefined. Researchers typically deal with this issue by removing low frequency features, but the thresholds for removal differ markedly between studies with little or no justification. Here, we present CurvCut, an unsupervised data-driven approach with human confirmation for rare-feature removal. CurvCut implements two distinct approaches for determining natural breaks in the feature distributions: a method based on curvature analysis borrowed from thermodynamics and the Fisher-Jenks statistical method. Our results show that CurvCut rapidly identifies data-specific breaks in these distributions that can be used as cutoff points for low-frequency feature removal that maximizes feature retention. We show that CurvCut works across different biological data types and rapidly generates clear visual results that allow researchers to confirm and apply feature removal cutoffs to individual datasets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.