ReviewAmerican journal of cancer research2023
Microbiome and its implications in oncogenesis: a Mendelian randomization perspective.
Review in American journal of cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- From association to causation: a decision-aware framework for reproducible biomarker discovery and precision intervention design in the human gut microbiome.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Gut Microbial Composition, Oxidative Stress, and Immunity in Metabolic Disease: Toward Personalized Interventions.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Identification of cancer-associated fibroblast signature genes for potential biomarkers in cholangiocarcinoma: a Mendelian randomization study.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Microbiota-driven epigenetic modifications in gastrointestinal cancer: Implications for pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Microbiome Integrity Enhances the Efficacy and Safety of Anticancer Drug.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Causal impact of genetically determined metabolites on kidney cancer and its subtypes: an integrated mendelian randomization and metabolomic study.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Microbiota of the Mammary Gland in Wistar Rats with Chemically Induced Breast Cancer after Treatment.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2024Article
- Physical Exercise and Mechanism Related to Alzheimer's Disease: Is Gut-Brain Axis Involved?Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Breast Cancer: Extracellular Matrix and Microbiome Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- From microbes to medicine: harnessing the gut microbiota to combat prostate cancer.Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human microbiome, an intricate ecological network, has garnered significant attention due to its potential implications in oncogenesis. This paper delves into the multifaceted relationships between the microbiome, its metabolites, and cancer development, emphasizing the human intestinal tract as the primary microbial habitat. Highlighting the potential causative associations between microbial disturbances and cancer progression, we underscore the role of specific bacterial strains in various cancers, such as stomach and colorectal cancer. Traditional causality assessment methods, like randomized controlled trials (RCTs), have limitations. Therefore, we advocate using Mendelian Randomization (MR) as a powerful alternative to study causal relationships, leveraging genetic variants as instrumental variables. With the proliferation of genome-wide association studies, MR harnesses genetic variations to infer causality, which is especially beneficial when addressing confounders like diet and lifestyle that can skew microbial research. We systematically review MR's application in understanding the microbiome-cancer nexus, emphasizing its strengths and challenges. While MR offers a unique perspective on causality, it faces hurdles like horizontal pleiotropy and weak instrumental variable bias. Integrating MR with multi-omics data, encompassing genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, holds promise for future research, potentially heralding groundbreaking discoveries in microbiology and genetics. This comprehensive review underscores the critical role of the human microbiome in oncogenesis and champions MR as an indispensable tool for advancing our understanding in this domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38187050PMC10767327W4390689672What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.