ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Effect of focused ultrasound ablation and myomectomy on pelvic adhesions in patients with uterine fibroids.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effects of focused ultrasound ablation (FUSA) versus conventional myomectomy on pelvic adhesions and fertility in the treatment of uterine fibroids.
methodsThe clinical data of 114 patients with uterine fibroids admitted to Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital from February 2020 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, among which 61 cases were treated with FUSA and 53 cases received myomectomy. The length of surgery, bleeding, hospitalization days, incidence of pelvic adhesions, and ovarian reserve function indexes (FSH (Follicle Stimulating Hormone), LH (Luteinizing Hormone) and E2 (Estradiol)) were compared between the two groups.
resultsCompared to the myomectomy group, the FUSA group had shorter operation time (P<0.001), no bleeding (P<0.001), less hospitalization (P<0.001), lower incidence of pelvic adhesion (P = 0.020), and less impairment of ovarian reserve function (Increased FSH, LH and E2, all P<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that the maximum diameter of leiomyoma ≥5 cm (P = 0.008), the number of pregnancies ≥3 (P = 0.003) and intraoperative hemorrhage (P = 0.004) were independent risk factors for pelvic adhesion.
conclusionsFUSA is a safe and effective non-invasive method for the treatment of uterine fibroids that reduces postoperative complications and protects fertility potential, especially for female patients with fertility concerns. Future studies need to overcome existing limitations to improve reliability of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38187000PMC10767541W4390689708What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.