ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Influence of rapid recovery nutritional support on functional recovery and hospitalization duration in patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar surgery.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of nursing interventions on the rehabilitation outcome of patients after lumbar spine surgery.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the impact of a nutrition support model, specifically focused on rapid recovery, on postoperative recovery in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted, utilizing the medical records of 114 patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent MIS-TLIF at the Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine from February 2020 to October 2022. Among these patients, 63 individuals received a nutrition support model based on the concept of rapid recovery, comprising the observation group, while the remaining 51 patients received conventional postoperative support, forming the control group. The study compared the post-intervention lumbar function recovery, postoperative pain score, perioperative hospital stay, and patient satisfaction with nursing work between the two groups.
resultsThere was no statistically significant difference in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 6 months after the intervention between the two groups (P>0.05). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in the modified Barthel index and visual analog scale scores at 6 months after the intervention between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of operation time and intraoperative blood loss, there was no statistically significant difference observed between the observation group and the control group (P>0.05). However, when compared to the control group, the observation group showed significant shorter hospital stay and time to ambulation after the intervention, leading to a decrease in treatment cost (P<0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, history of diabetes, nursing plan, operation time, and preoperative JOA score were identified as independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay (P<0.05).
conclusionThe nutrition support model, which is based on the concept of rapid recovery, has been found to have several benefits for patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing MIS-TLIF. These benefits include reducing the hospital stay, treatment cost, and the time to ambulation. Additionally, logistic regression analysis has identified several independent risk factors that can affect the length of hospital stay. These risk factors include age, history of diabetes, nursing plan, operation time, and preoperative JOA score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38186983PMC10767528W4390689840What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.