ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2024
Characterization of perception by transcutaneous electrical Stimulation in terms of tingling intensity and temporal dynamics.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic current ratio control and biophysical modeling for personalised electro-tactile perception.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Wearable Fabric Electrotactile System with Stimulation-Inhibition Electrode Units.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Electro-tactile modulation of muscle activation and intermuscular coordination in the human upper extremity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sensory feedback for gait in transtibial amputees: a narrative review of technologies and clinical outcomes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Location-based electrotactile feedback localizes hitting point in virtual-reality table tennis game.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Article
- Proportional sway-based electrotactile feedback improves lateral standing balance.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrotactile feedback is a cost-effective and versatile method to provide new information or to augment intrinsic tactile feedback. As tactile feedback provides critical information for human-environment interaction, electrotactile feedback, accordingly, has many purposes to improve the quality of human-environment interaction in both direct and remote settings. However, electrotactile feedback overlays tingling sensation on top of the natural tactile feedback. To better characterize electrotactile feedback and understand the origin of the tingling sensation, a need arises to characterize the human perception of electrotactile feedback qualitatively and quantitatively, while varying the key stimulation parameters, namely amplitude and frequency. This study consists of two experiments. In the first experiment, the voltage for each subject was characterized by setting perception and discomfort thresholds. In the second experiment, subjects received electrical stimulation in 9 different combinations of voltages and frequencies. On delivering stimulation with each parameter combination, subjects reported their perception in two comparative scales-pressure vs. tingling and constant vs. pulsing. Subjects also reported the location of perception for stimulation with every parameter combination. More tingling and less pressure was reported as frequency increased, while the tingling-pressure percept was not affected by the amplitude change. Additionally, less pulsing and more constant was reported as frequency increased, while the pulsing-constant percept was not affected by the amplitude change. Concurrently, the normalized level of voltage thresholds was decreased as frequency increased. Dependency of tingling-pressure percept on stimulation frequency suggests that incongruency between the stimulation frequency and the natural firing rate of the sensory neuron would be an important factor of the tingling sensation. This study is a steppingstone to further demystify the origin of the tingling percept caused by electrical stimulation, thus broadening the use of transcutaneous electrical stimulation as a way of providing tactile cue or augmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.