Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38186917›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2023

Frequency of surgical bone augmentation methods complementary to dental implant placement: A study evaluated with cone beam computed tomography.

Gutierrez-Draxl Mateo, Juan-Pedro Mazón-Esteve, Carlos-Rafael Pineda-Villacorta, Juan-Antonio Blaya-Tarraga, José-María Diaz-Fernandez

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gutierrez-Draxl MateoUniversidad Europea de Valencia. Faculty of Health Sciences. Department of Dentistry.
Juan-Pedro Mazón-EsteveUniversidad Europea de Valencia. Faculty of Health Sciences. Department of Dentistry.
Carlos-Rafael Pineda-VillacortaUniversidad Europea de Valencia. Faculty of Health Sciences. Department of Dentistry.
Juan-Antonio Blaya-TarragaUniversidad Europea de Valencia. Faculty of Health Sciences. Department of Dentistry.
José-María Diaz-FernandezUniversidad Europea de Valencia. Faculty of Health Sciences. Department of Dentistry.
Universidad Europea de Madrid · ESUniversidad Europea · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The success of dental implants largely depends on the quantity and quality of available bone. Occasionally, it is necessary to perform additional surgical techniques alongside implant placement to increase the available bone volume and ensure the success and survival of treatments. The objective of this study was to evaluate, through cone beam computed tomography, the need for supplementary bone augmentation methods in implant placement. Additionally, the study aimed to assess the frequency of such techniques based on gender, anatomical sectors, and types of bone augmentation procedures. Material and Methods: The analysis included 106 cone beam computed tomography images obtained from 77 patients over the age of 18 who sought oral rehabilitation with implants at the University Clinic of the Master's Program in Oral Implantology at the European University of Valencia. Results: A total of 201 edentulous sextants were analyzed. It was observed that 63.68% of the sextants required a bone augmentation technique, and there was a statistically significant difference ( Conclusions: A high frequency of bone augmentation need for implant placement was demonstrated. It was shown that some form of supplementary surgical method was required in implant placement (63.68%). The highest need for bone augmentation was observed in the posterior maxillary sector, primarily in the vertical type (29.27%), accompanied by lateral window sinus elevation technique (49.38%).

Identifiers

PMID38186917
PMCPMC10767736
OpenAlexW4389264838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.