Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38186912›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2023

In vitro effect of two resin based materials for treating initial caries lesion around braces, under cariogenic challenge.

Maria-Gisette-Arias Provenzano, Gabriela-Cristina Santin, Daniela Rios, Sandra-Kiss Moura, Regina-Guenka Palma-Dibb, Tuane-Mertz Lucietto, Jay Bowman, Adilson-Luiz Ramos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria-Gisette-Arias ProvenzanoDDS, MS, PhD, Assistant Professor. Department of Dentistry, State University of Maringa - UEM, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Gabriela-Cristina SantinDDS, MS, PhD, Assistant Professor. Department of Dentistry, State University of Maringa - UEM, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Daniela RiosDDS, MS, PhD, Associate Professor. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics and Public Health, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Sandra-Kiss MouraDDS, MS, PhD, Assistant Professor. Department of Biophotonics Applied to Health Sciences, University Nove de Julho (UNINOVE), São Paulo, Brazil.
Regina-Guenka Palma-DibbDDS, MS, PhD, Full Professor. Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Tuane-Mertz LuciettoDDS, MS, PhD student. Department of Dentistry, State University of Maringa - UEM, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.
Jay BowmanDDS, Adjunct Associate Professor. Orthodontist - Private Practice, Department of Orthodontics, University of Michigan and Saint Louis University, Missouri, USA.
Adilson-Luiz RamosDDS, MS, PhD, Assistant Professor. Department of Dentistry, State University of Maringa - UEM, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Orthodontic treatment makes the patient susceptible to the development of white spot lesions (WSL) due to the greater accumulation of bacterial plaque. The purpose of this Material and Methods: 36 extracted human molars presenting natural WSL were included. They were randomly divided into 2 groups for intervention: IC (Infiltration resin Icon®) and PS (resin sealant Pro Seal ®). Braces were bonded just above the WSL. The enamel surface around the brace was treated by one of the tested materials, leaving another part to be control. The samples were submitted again to a cariogenic challenge. The exposed enamel non-treated area from booth groups comprised the control group (E). For morphological analysis, confocal images were taken at baseline, after treatment, and after pH cycling of each sample. Lesion depth were measured (µm) and compared to the enamel thickness to calculate a demineralization index. All groups were compared using the Kruskal Wallis test and Dunn's post-test. Results: PS group showed the lowest demineralization index (0.27 µm) when compared to the control area (0.39 µm) ( Conclusions: The resin sealant Pro Seal® had a positive protective effect under white spot environmental area and Icon® infiltrant, although showed some protection, did not statistically differ from controls.

Identifiers

PMID38186912
PMCPMC10767733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.