ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2023
In vitro effect of two resin based materials for treating initial caries lesion around braces, under cariogenic challenge.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of low viscosity resin infiltrant on the adhesion of orthodontic attachments.Dental press journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
- Effect of EGCG-Methacrylate-Functionalized Resin Infiltrant on White Spot Lesions: An In Vitro Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Orthodontic treatment makes the patient susceptible to the development of white spot lesions (WSL) due to the greater accumulation of bacterial plaque. The purpose of this Material and Methods: 36 extracted human molars presenting natural WSL were included. They were randomly divided into 2 groups for intervention: IC (Infiltration resin Icon®) and PS (resin sealant Pro Seal ®). Braces were bonded just above the WSL. The enamel surface around the brace was treated by one of the tested materials, leaving another part to be control. The samples were submitted again to a cariogenic challenge. The exposed enamel non-treated area from booth groups comprised the control group (E). For morphological analysis, confocal images were taken at baseline, after treatment, and after pH cycling of each sample. Lesion depth were measured (µm) and compared to the enamel thickness to calculate a demineralization index. All groups were compared using the Kruskal Wallis test and Dunn's post-test. Results: PS group showed the lowest demineralization index (0.27 µm) when compared to the control area (0.39 µm) ( Conclusions: The resin sealant Pro Seal® had a positive protective effect under white spot environmental area and Icon® infiltrant, although showed some protection, did not statistically differ from controls.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.