ReviewClinical kidney journal2024
Kidney and urine cell transcriptomics in IgA nephropathy and lupus nephritis: a narrative review.
Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Integrated Transcriptomic and Machine Learning Analyses Identify KCNN3 and TLR10 as Candidate Cell-Type-Associated Molecules in Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic Signatures in IgA Nephropathy: From Renal Tissue to Precision Risk Stratification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Decoding Kidney Pathophysiology: Omics-Driven Approaches in Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review sheds light on the use of transcriptomics in the analysis of kidney biopsies and urinary cell samples from patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy or lupus nephritis. The conventional methods of examining kidney biopsy through light microscopy, immunofluorescence and electron microscopy provide valuable clinical information for diagnosis and prognosis but have some limitations that transcriptomics can address. Some recent studies have reported that kidney transcriptomics has uncovered new molecular biomarkers implicated in the inflammatory process induced by the deposition of circulating immune complexes in the investigated kidney diseases. In addition, transcriptomics applied to urinary cells mirrors the inflammatory process that occurs in the kidney. This means that we can study urinary cell transcriptomics in clinical practice to diagnose the stage of the inflammatory process. Furthermore, the transcriptomics of urinary cells can be used to make therapy decisions during patient follow-up to avoid the stress of a second kidney biopsy. The studies analyzed in this review have a significant limitation. Biomarkers have been identified in small cohorts of patients but none of them has been validated in independent external cohorts. Further prospective studies in large cohorts of patients are necessary for accurate and complete validation. Only after that can these biomarkers be widely used in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.