Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38186897›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2024

Should we enlarge the indication for kidney biopsy in diabetics? The con part.

Alberto Ortiz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alberto OrtizDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz UAM, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9805-9523
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes is the most common cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD), a condition found in 850 million persons and projected to become the fifth global cause of death by 2040. Research is needed that examines kidney tissue to characterize distinct phenotypes in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and CKD so as to identify non-invasive biomarker signatures and develop targeted therapeutic approaches. However, from a routine care point of view, kidney biopsy is likely overused in patients with CKD and DM, as most biopsy results are not expected to be associated with a therapeutic approach that differs from standard kidney protection with triple or quadruple therapy (renin-angiotensin system blockade, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists). Moreover, expanding the kidney biopsy criteria will increase the absolute number of complications from kidney biopsies, which may reach 27 000 to 108 000 deaths of persons that would derive little benefit from kidney biopsy if all people with DM and severe CKD were biopsied globally. Finally, limited resources should be optimally allocated. The cost of one kidney biopsy can fund 7000 semiquantitative urinary albumin:creatinine ratio assessments that could identify earlier stages of the disease and allow treatment that prevents progression to a stage at which kidney biopsy may be considered.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseasediabetesdiabetic kidney diseasediabetic nephropathykidney biopsy

Identifiers

PMID38186897
PMCPMC10768755
OpenAlexW4388204811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.