ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2023
Comparative study of 'the clinical profile of COVID-19-positive patients with and without vaccination profile'.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: More than 4.5 million people have perished from the COVID-19 virus, which has so far been linked to more than 200 million reported cases. Vaccination is an ultimatum for survival from this disease. Hence, this research was designed to study the course of disease in vaccinated and unvaccinated group and to understand the significance of blood markers, to study lung involvement (HRCT), number of hospitalised days, number of O Material and Methods: A cohort study was conducted among COVID-19-positive patients tested either with rapid antigen test or RT-PCR test hospitalised in Kullolli Institute of Health Services. Patients who had received at least one dose of vaccination were included in the analysis. Data were analysed by using unpaired Results: In the study, only 71 (18.6%) patients were vaccinated. There were 49 (69.01%) patients out of 71, representing a massive number of vaccinations for people over the age of 50. There were 40 patients with co-morbid conditions, 31 (77.50%) of whom were vaccinated. CRP levels were significantly severe in non-survived patients of non-vaccinated group (Fisher's exact = 8.938, Conclusion: Vaccination has enormous life-saving potential. Regardless of the type of vaccine used, the immunisation provides life-saving protection against a disease that has killed millions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.