ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2023
Clinicoepidemiologic profile of leprosy in geriatric population in post-elimination era: A retrospective, hospital-based, cross-sectional study from Eastern India.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Geriatric populations are susceptible to leprosy infection with masked clinical signs due to lower immunity in them. Our aim was to analyze the clinicoepidemiologic profile of patients with geriatric leprosy and find out the reasons for delayed diagnosis and treatment. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, record-based study was conducted in a tertiary care center from May 2019 to May 2022. The clinicodemographic data of biopsy-confirmed leprosy cases aged ≥60 years were obtained from the leprosy clinic record. Various reasons for the delay in treatment were also recorded. Simple statistics was used for analysis. Results: Out of 605 leprosy cases, 50 (7.4%) cases belonged to the geriatric population. Males outnumbered females (M/F = 37/13). The mean age of the patients was 66.28 + 6.5 years. Maximum patients belonged to 60-69 years of age. The mean duration of illness was 35.22 months (range 1-240 months). Most of the patients were illiterate (33.6%), and 56% were farmers by occupation. The ulnar nerve was the most common nerve to be thickened in 90% (45/50) cases, followed by the common peroneal nerve in 54% (27/50) cases, radical cutaneous nerve in 52% (26/50) cases, and posterior tibial nerve in 24% (12/50) cases. Borderline tuberculoid was the most common type in 44% cases, followed by lepromatous leprosy in 22%, borderline lepromatous leprosy in 18% (9/50), and pure neuritic leprosy in 14%. Type 1 and type 2 lepra reactions were found in 18% and 14% cases, respectively. Also, 38% had grade 2 disability. Common reasons for the delay in treatment were financial constraints, lack of family support, and personal superstitious beliefs. The study was limited by its retrospective nature. Conclusion: Geriatric leprosy needs special attention as the elderly are more prone for deformities; also, because of low immunity, there is a high chance of developing multibacillary leprosy, and therefore, they are potential sources of infection to the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.