ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2024
Digital analysis of the prostate tumor microenvironment with high-order chromogenic multiplexing.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concurrent Viewing of H&E and Multiplex Immunohistochemistry in Clinical Specimens.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As our understanding of the tumor microenvironment grows, the pathology field is increasingly utilizing multianalyte diagnostic assays to understand important characteristics of tumor growth. In clinical settings, brightfield chromogenic assays represent the gold-standard and have developed significant trust as the first-line diagnostic method. However, conventional brightfield tests have been limited to low-order assays that are visually interrogated. We have developed a hybrid method of brightfield chromogenic multiplexing that overcomes these limitations and enables high-order multiplex assays. However, how compatible high-order brightfield multiplexed images are with advanced analytical algorithms has not been extensively evaluated. In the present study, we address this gap by developing a novel 6-marker prostate cancer assay that targets diverse aspects of the tumor microenvironment such as prostate-specific biomarkers (PSMA and p504s), immune biomarkers (CD8 and PD-L1), a prognostic biomarker (Ki-67), as well as an adjunctive diagnostic biomarker (basal cell cocktail) and apply the assay to 143 differentially graded adenocarcinoma prostate tissues. The tissues were then imaged on our spectroscopic multiplexing imaging platform and mined for proteomic and spatial features that were correlated with cancer presence and disease grade. Extracted features were used to train a UMAP model that differentiated healthy from cancerous tissue with an accuracy of 89% and identified clusters of cells based on cancer grade. For spatial analysis, cell-to-cell distances were calculated for all biomarkers and differences between healthy and adenocarcinoma tissues were studied. We report that p504s positive cells were at least 2× closer to cells expressing PD-L1, CD8, Ki-67, and basal cell in adenocarcinoma tissues relative to the healthy control tissues. These findings offer a powerful insight to understand the fingerprint of the prostate tumor microenvironment and indicate that high-order chromogenic multiplexing is compatible with digital analysis. Thus, the presented chromogenic multiplexing system combines the clinical applicability of brightfield assays with the emerging diagnostic power of high-order multiplexing in a digital pathology friendly format that is well-suited for translational studies to better understand mechanisms of tumor development and growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.