ArticleOncology research2023
Extensive prediction of drug response in mutation-subtype-specific LUAD with machine learning approach.
Article in Oncology research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond chemotherapy: The rise of nucleic acid nanoformulations in personalized lung cancer therapy.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and anti-cancer drugs' response.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer is the most prevalent cancer diagnosis and the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Therapeutic failure in lung cancer (LUAD) is heavily influenced by drug resistance. This challenge stems from the diverse cell populations within the tumor, each having unique genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic profiles. Such variations lead to varied therapeutic responses, thereby contributing to tumor relapse and disease progression. Methods: The Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database was used in this investigation to obtain the mRNA expression dataset, genomic mutation profile, and drug sensitivity information of NSCLS. Machine Learning (ML) methods, including Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neurol Network (ANN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), were used to predict the response status of each compound based on the mRNA and mutation characteristics determined using statistical methods. The most suitable method for each drug was proposed by comparing the prediction accuracy of different ML methods, and the selected mRNA and mutation characteristics were identified as molecular features for the drug-responsive cancer subtype. Finally, the prognostic influence of molecular features on the mutational subtype of LUAD in publicly available datasets. Results: Our analyses yielded 1,564 gene features and 45 mutational features for 46 drugs. Applying the ML approach to predict the drug response for each medication revealed an upstanding performance for SVM in predicting Afuresertib drug response (area under the curve [AUC] 0.875) using CIT, GAS2L3, STAG3L3, ATP2B4-mut, and IL15RA-mut as molecular features. Furthermore, the ANN algorithm using 9 mRNA characteristics demonstrated the highest prediction performance (AUC 0.780) in Gefitinib with CCL23-mut. Conclusion: This work extensively investigated the mRNA and mutation signatures associated with drug response in LUAD using a machine-learning approach and proposed a priority algorithm to predict drug response for different drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.