Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38186548›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

D-dimer as a Rule-Out for Aortic Dissection.

Jeremy M Carter, Roshan B Tom, Raheed Sunesra, Nathaniel J Bilby, Blake Mireles, Krishna K Paul, Paul A Koscumb, Mitchell W Cox, Dietrich V Jehle

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeremy M CarterDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Roshan B TomDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Raheed SunesraDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Nathaniel J BilbyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Blake MirelesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Krishna K PaulDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Paul A KoscumbDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Mitchell W CoxDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
Dietrich V JehleDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, USA.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001439 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI URBAN, RANDALL J · 2015 to 2024
$40.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Acute aortic dissection (AAD) represents a significant diagnostic challenge with a high mortality rate if not treated promptly. This challenge arises from the diverse clinical presentations of AAD, and its symptom overlap with other medical conditions. Although both helical CT and transesophageal echocardiography are reliable diagnostic tools for AAD, they are not feasible for every suspected case. Furthermore, limited research on D-dimer's utility in ruling out AAD has been conducted due to the condition's rarity. Methods This study utilizes the TriNetX database (https://trinetx.com/), encompassing data from 54 healthcare organizations across the United States over the past two decades from 85 million patients. The objective is to evaluate the sensitivity of an elevated D-dimer level in diagnosing AAD across a much larger patient cohort than previously studied. Results Retrospectively analyzing this dataset, there were 1,319 patients identified with a confirmed AAD who had undergone D-dimer testing within a day of diagnosis. Of these, 1,252 patients exhibited D-dimer levels exceeding 400 ng/ml while 1,227 had levels surpassing 500 ng/ml. Notably, a D-dimer cutoff of 400 ng/ml demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.949 while a 500 ng/ml cutoff yielded a sensitivity of 0.930. Conclusion This large retrospective cohort study demonstrates that a blood D-dimer level is highly sensitive in assaying for AAD. The D-dimer levels analyzed showed a remarkable sensitivity in ruling out AAD, avoiding the need for more invasive testing in low-risk patients.

Indexed as

acute aortic dissectioncardiovasculard-dimerdissection of thoracic aortaemergency medicine

Identifiers

PMID38186548
PMCPMC10771797
OpenAlexW4389478135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.