ArticleCureus2023
Importance of History Taking and Physical Examination Before Rapid Laboratory Test for Seasonal Influenza Virus: A Single-Center Multiple Logistic Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Despite several rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs), they are predicting whether a patient has influenza before rapid testing is important. Here, we assessed factors predictive of a positive flu test via RIDTs by combining interviews and physical examination. Methods We analyzed the relationship between interviews and physical findings and results of RIDTs using multivariable logistic regression. Results Two hundred seventy-six children were enrolled throughout the 2018-2019 flu season. Accordingly, 115 patients (41.7%) were positive for flu A. Our logistic regression model identified age, body temperature, and the existence of upper respiratory symptoms as significant factors for predicting positive for RIDTs, with odds ratios (OR) of 1.17 [95% CI (confidence interval): 1.08-1.25]/+Δ1year old, 1.70 (95% CI: 1.27-2.27)/+Δ1 ℃, and 5.08 (95% CI: 2.57-10.00) for respiratory symptoms. In addition, the OR for sick contact was 7.67 (95% CI: 3.96-14.90). Our logistic regression model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84. History of vaccination was not identified as a significant factor in positive RIDTs. Conclusions The existence of sick contact was associated with a positive flu test via RIDTs. Although RIDTs are an easy and quick method for detecting the flu virus, we should perform the appropriate identification of cases for RIDTs by combining interviews and physical findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.